• Potenza massima 94 kW a 10.000 min-1 (95/1/EC)[/*:m]
• Coppia massima 97,5 Nm a 8.000 min-1 (95/1/EC)[/*:m]

Max power Output 92kW / 10.000min (95/1/EC) ( 127 hp )
Max torque 100Nm / 8.000min (95/1/EC)

That seems pretty close to what I had from Italy a few months back. I hope it will get to more than 140 else it'll not be much faster than the 600 Hornet, which gets 130+ (indicated, granted).

Do we know if this is a rear-wheel or crank based figure? I'm guessing crank?

Just for reference, here is the 900 Hornet's figures as quoted by Honda

Max. Power Output 109 bhp at 9,000 rpm
Max. Torque 92Nm at 6,500 rpm

 

CB1000R 2008:
Power: 92kW (123.3 hp) 10.000 r/min (95/1/EC) ( 127 hp ??)
Torque: 100Nm ( 10.2 kgm) / 8.000 r/min (95/1/EC)

Hornet 900 2002 model:
Power: 81 kW (108.6 hp) 9.000 r/min (95/1/EC)
Torque: 92 Nm (9.4 kgm) 6.500 r/min (95/1/EC)

Yamaha FZ1:
Power: 110,3 kW (150 hp) a 11.000 giri/min.
Torque: 106,0 Nm (10,8 kgm) a 8.000 giri/min.

Triumph Speed Triple 2008 model:
Power: 97.7 kW (131hp) a 9.250 giri
Torque: 105Nm (10,7 kgm) a 7.500 giri

Kawasaki Z1000 (2007):
Power: 92 kW (125 hp) / 10.000 g/min
Torque: 98,7 Nm (10,1 kgm) / 8.200 g/min
:zzz :zzz :zzz

 

By the way, in my opinion, the most important aspect to look at is "where" power and torque are located on the power and torque graph...
I't not enough to know max values...
:cool :cool :cool

 

Hornet 2007:
...
Potenza massima 75 kW a 12.000 min-1 (95/1/EC)
Coppia massima 63,5 Nm a 10.500 min-1 (95/1/EC)
...
:shake :shake :shake

 

Yamaha FZ1:
...
Potenza massima 110,3 kW (150 Cv) a 11.000 giri/min.
Coppia massima 106,0 Nm (10,8 kg-m) a 8.000 giri/min.
...
:rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes

 

Triumph Speed Triple:
...
Potenza Massima: 131CV a 9.250 giri
Coppia Massima: 105Nm a 7.500 giri
...
:| :| :|

 

Kawasaki Z1000 (2007):
...
Massima potenza 92 kW (125 CV) / 10.000 g/min
Coppia massima 98,7 Nm (10,1 kgm) / 8.200 g/min
...

 

By the way, in my opinion, the most important aspect to look at is "where" power and torque are located on the power and torque graph...
I't not enough to now max values...
:cool :cool :cool

I do agree with you there completely, but I still want to see higher figures personally. Not massively higher, but higher nonetheless.

Here's a comparison over the quoted figures from Honda UK for the 06/07 Blade on which the engine is based and the CBF1000 which also has the same engine but detuned further:

06/07 Fireblade
126.4kW / 11,250min-¹ (95/1/EC) (170 hp)
114.5Nm / 10,000min-¹ (95/1/EC)

08 CB1000R
92kW / 10,000min-¹ (95/1/EC) (123 hp)
100Nm / 8,000min-¹ (95/1/EC)

06 CBF1000
72 kW/8,000 min-¹ (95/1/EC) (96 hp)
97 Nm/6,500 min-¹ (95/1/EC)

 

By the way 92kw are not 127hp but 123.3!!!
:shake :shake :shake

 

Me thinks its better to wait 'til it comes out then we will all see what we are getting ray

 

By the way 92kw are not 127hp but 123.3!!!

I did think that sounded wrong. I looked back and my original info said 94kW which I worked out to be 126hp. Didn't bother to check my own calculations

I agree Bill, I shall wait for now. In fairness, have we seen anything concrete that says that this is the spec according to Honda? I looked on Honda.be and I couldn't see where it said anything about power yet. It doesn't help that I don't speak French or Dutch mind you.

 

Max power Output 92kW / 10.000min (95/1/EC) ( 127 hp )
Max torque 100Nm / 8.000min (95/1/EC)

That information has been backed up by the Moto-Station.com review of the CB1000R :clap Rata

 

Bit gutted at the announced weight of it at 217kg its only about 9kg lighter than my CBF thou was hoping it was gonna be considerably lighter :thumbdown

 

You know the weight is wet right Bill?

 

You know the weight is wet right Bill?

Yes but isn't the CBF's quoted weight of 226kg wet too???? :help

 

Probably Bill... I'd expect both bikes to be of similar weights personally.

 

Probably Bill... I'd expect both bikes to be of similar weights personally.

Cheers Dan I personally thought with the lighter frame etc the CB1000R would be considerably lighter than the CBF thou having said that the single sided swinging arm probably weight a proverbial ton :cry

 

Yeah the single sider... looks good but is unnecessary really... plus as you say it adds weight (but it makes removing the rear wheel a doodle!) :thumbup

 

The CBF1000's dry weight is 220kg
http://www.honda.co.uk/motorcycles/Disp ... #focusHere

The CB1000R's dry weight must be around 190kg.

Regards
Ernst

 

Yes indeed Ernst, well done....

There you go then Bill... much much lighter!!

By the way :welcome Ernst, please take a moment to introduce yourself in our Introductions forum.

:clap

 

The CBF1000's dry weight is 220kg
http://www.honda.co.uk/motorcycles/Disp ... #focusHere

I was gonna say; Honda have only just started quoting wet weights, which I think is a bit cheeky TBH. Sure, we don't ride round on dry bikes so the dry weight is irrelevant in that respect, but the CB has a small tank so its wet weight may appear really light too. Personally I'd like to see a wet and dry weight, so you can see what difference things like fuel make to the bike.

You can see just by looking at it that it's a lot lighter than the CBF, which only shares a common engine, albeit completely differently tuned. The CBF is a bus compared to the CB

 

The CBF1000's dry weight is 220kg
http://www.honda.co.uk/motorcycles/Disp ... #focusHere

The CB1000R's dry weight must be around 190kg.

Regards
Ernst

Cheers Ernst all far to complicated why not stick with either day weights or wet weights as Antee & Dan have both commented on